What Books Did Martin Luther Remove From the Bible

What Books Did Martin Luther Remove From the Bible?

Martin Luther, the renowned German theologian and key figure in the Protestant Reformation, is often associated with the removal of certain books from the Bible. While it is true that he expressed concerns about the canonicity of several books, it is important to understand the historical context and reasons behind his actions. In this article, we will explore the books that Martin Luther questioned and provide insights into his views on their inclusion in the Bible.

1. The Apocrypha:
The Apocrypha refers to a collection of books that were included in the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible widely used during the time of Jesus and the early Christian church. However, these books were not part of the Hebrew Bible accepted by Jewish authorities. Martin Luther, along with other reformers, questioned the authority of the Apocrypha and moved them to a separate section in his German translation of the Bible. This decision was mainly based on the fact that these books were not originally written in Hebrew and were not considered part of the Jewish canon.

2. The Book of James:
Martin Luther famously described the Book of James as an “epistle of straw” due to his disagreement with its emphasis on good works. He believed that the book contradicted his understanding of salvation by faith alone. However, it is important to note that Luther did not remove the Book of James from the Bible, but rather expressed doubts about its canonicity. The book remained in Luther’s translation of the Bible, and it is included in all modern translations as well.

3. The Book of Hebrews:
Similar to his views on James, Martin Luther questioned the canonicity of the Book of Hebrews due to its teachings on faith and works. Luther’s concern stemmed from the fact that the book did not explicitly mention the author’s name and did not conform to his understanding of the Gospel. However, he did not remove the book from his translation of the Bible, and it continues to be included in all versions today.

4. The Book of Revelation:
While Martin Luther did not remove the Book of Revelation from the Bible, he expressed doubts about its inspiration and canonicity. Luther questioned the book’s apocalyptic nature and believed that it did not conform to his understanding of the Gospel message. However, the Book of Revelation remains an integral part of the New Testament in all modern translations.

FAQs:

Q: Did Martin Luther remove any books from the Bible?
A: No, Martin Luther did not remove any books from the Bible. However, he expressed concerns about the canonicity of certain books, such as the Apocrypha, James, Hebrews, and Revelation.

Q: Why did Martin Luther question the canonicity of these books?
A: Martin Luther questioned the canonicity of these books primarily because they did not align with his interpretation of the Gospel message, especially regarding the concepts of faith and works.

Q: Are the books that Martin Luther questioned still included in the Bible today?
A: Yes, all the books that Martin Luther questioned, including the Apocrypha, James, Hebrews, and Revelation, are still included in the Bible today. These books have been recognized as canonical by various Christian denominations.

Q: Did Martin Luther’s views on these books influence other translations of the Bible?
A: Yes, Martin Luther’s translation of the Bible into German played a significant role in the development of modern Bible translations. However, his views on specific books did not result in their removal from subsequent translations.

In conclusion, while Martin Luther questioned the canonicity of several books, he did not remove any from the Bible. His concerns primarily revolved around the Apocrypha, James, Hebrews, and Revelation. These books, however, have continued to be included in the Bible throughout history and remain a vital part of Christian scripture today.

Scroll to Top